SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTER

Infant feeding method will be categorized in four ways: exclusive breastfeeding at the breast; expressed breastmilk of mothers' own milk by any method (e.g. bottle, supplemental nursing system, syringe, spoon, or cup); mixed feeding which is a combination breastmilk, formula or pasteurized human donor breast milk; and formula feeding via bottle. 

High-fidelity or low-fidelity laboratory-based, standardized patient-based, virtual screen-based, or any other methods of simulation used to deliver wound care education.

The main concept is patient navigation programs for injury-related trauma patients and/or their caregivers. Patient navigation will be defined as a partnership between a patient, caregiver, or member(s) of the care team and a patient navigator (including professional, lay, or peer navigators) which facilitates timely access to health and/or community services and resources, and fosters self-management and autonomy through education and emotional support. Impact is the secondary concept of this scoping review. This review will consider articles that report impact employing a variety of evaluation methods.

NIBS, i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Non-traumatic dental conditions.

The concept of self-management, a key element of the study. We intend to map the scientific evidence published on this concept and identify the health interventions promoting self-management, as well as how they have been addressed by the scientific community over time. In this study, self-management promotion was considered as a multidisciplinary health intervention.

The participant’s lived experience from the perspective of the individual, parent, teacher, peer or health professional. 

Phenomena of Interest

 - Stroke survivors' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR
 - TR providers' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR for the provision of rehabilitation to stroke survivors
 - TR providers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Caregivers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and utilisation of TR experienced in specific subgroups of stroke survivors
 - Barriers and facilitators experienced with specific approaches to TR intervention

Intervention

Included:
 - Interventions whereby rehabilitation services are provided by a TR provider to a stroke survivor remotely via information and communication technologies. All formats of TR delivery will be considered, including but not limited to: (1) mode of communication between TR provider and stroke survivor: audio-only calling, videoconferencing, digital text or automated delivery of participant progress with intervention collected via sensors (2) rehabilitative intervention: video, image or written rehabilitation programmes, or rehabilitation programmes facilitated via apps, virtual-reality (VR), sensors or haptic technology (3) aim of intervention: to improve, maintain or promote self-management of physical, cognitive, speech and/or social/emotional functioning impairments in stroke survivors as a consequence of stroke. Greater than 50% of all communication between TR provider and stroke survivor must have taken place remotely through telecommunication technology, rather than face-to-face in order to be considered TR. TR approaches will be eligible for inclusion if they are provided with real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (synchronous), no real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (asynchronous), or a combination of the two.
Excluded:
 - TR interventions that are assessment only or TR interventions that aim to prevent stroke.