SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTER

The index test(s) include all imaging modalities used to detect ECS in P16+ OPSCC including CT, MRI, PET, combination PET / CT and US.

N/A

Appraisal tool for risk of bias assessment of mixed methods study.

The concept examined in this scoping review is the QSEN competency of nursing evidence based practice. Criteria may include, but is not limited to, location of QSEN evidence based practice within the curriculum, teaching strategies for QSEN evidence based practice and how QSEN evidence based practice learning is assessed.

The concept examined in this scoping review is the QSEN competency of Patient Centered Care. Criteria may include, but is not limited to, location of QSEN Patient Centered Care within the curriculum, teaching strategies for QSEN Patient Centered Care and how QSEN Patient Centered Care learning is assessed.

The concept examined in this scoping review is the QSEN competency of Patient Safety. Criteria may include, but is not limited to, location of QSEN Patient Safety within the curriculum, teaching strategies for QSEN Patient Safety and how QSEN Patient Safety learning is assessed.

The concept examined in this scoping review is the QSEN competency of Quality Improvement. Criteria may include, but is not limited to, location of QSEN Quality Improvement within the curriculum, teaching strategies for QSEN Quality Improvement and how QSEN Quality Improvement learning is assessed.

The concept examined in this scoping review is the QSEN competency of Teamwork and Collaboration. Criteria may include, but is not limited to, location of QSEN Teamwork and Collaboration within the curriculum, teaching strategies for QSEN Teamwork and Collaboration and how QSEN Teamwork and Collaboration learning is assessed.

Phenomena of Interest

 - Stroke survivors' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR
 - TR providers' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR for the provision of rehabilitation to stroke survivors
 - TR providers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Caregivers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and utilisation of TR experienced in specific subgroups of stroke survivors
 - Barriers and facilitators experienced with specific approaches to TR intervention

Intervention

Included:
 - Interventions whereby rehabilitation services are provided by a TR provider to a stroke survivor remotely via information and communication technologies. All formats of TR delivery will be considered, including but not limited to: (1) mode of communication between TR provider and stroke survivor: audio-only calling, videoconferencing, digital text or automated delivery of participant progress with intervention collected via sensors (2) rehabilitative intervention: video, image or written rehabilitation programmes, or rehabilitation programmes facilitated via apps, virtual-reality (VR), sensors or haptic technology (3) aim of intervention: to improve, maintain or promote self-management of physical, cognitive, speech and/or social/emotional functioning impairments in stroke survivors as a consequence of stroke. Greater than 50% of all communication between TR provider and stroke survivor must have taken place remotely through telecommunication technology, rather than face-to-face in order to be considered TR. TR approaches will be eligible for inclusion if they are provided with real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (synchronous), no real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (asynchronous), or a combination of the two.
Excluded:
 - TR interventions that are assessment only or TR interventions that aim to prevent stroke.

Not applicable