SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTER

The concept of interest is measurement of chest health in children with a neurodisability. Measure of chest health will be defined as a assessment and/or monitoring of lung function and its associated structures. This may be measured at impairment or body structure level, but will also consider measures at activity or participation level, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The measure may be implemented across any environment or setting, include objective, subjective or combined implementation and encompass measures undertaken by professionals, patients or their caregiver. It will not include invasive measurements. 

NDIS OR “National Disability Insurance Scheme” OR “Marketized funding” OR “Individualised funding” OR “Personalised funding” OR “Disability policy” OR “Disability funding” OR Model OR “Marketised funding” OR “Individualized funding” OR “personalized funding”

Various intracanal medicaments (triple antibiotic paste, propolis, 6% NaOCl, 1% metronidazole gel, 1% CHX gel, bioactive glass S53P4, Ocimum sanctum, formocresol, 2% glutaraldehyde, iodine-potassium iodide, 2% betadine gel)

Concept: 
Family presence at the bedside is defined as a family member being physically present in the PICU with the critically ill child during routine care practices. Key to this definition is the family member-child dyad. Family presence may be considered passive, in which the family member is in the room with the child and not participating in hand-on care, or active, in which the family member is engaging with the child in either their family-based role or to assist with provision of comfort or care. 

Studies will be included that discuss or examine variables as either correlated with or predictive of the amount of time that families spend at the bedside, or that discuss factors that make it easier or harder to be present with the child at the bedside. Factors may be intrinsic or extrinsic to the family members. Intrinsic factors may include (but are not limited to) psychological factors, capabilities, motivators, and physical status. Extrinsic factors may include (but are not limited to) hospital and intensive care unit location, design, culture, practices, initiatives, and policy, healthcare provider attitude, child and disease-related factors, and home-life. 
 

Phenomena of Interest

 - Stroke survivors' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR
 - TR providers' experiences and/or perceptions of barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilisation of TR for the provision of rehabilitation to stroke survivors
 - TR providers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Caregivers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators experienced by stroke survivors in the uptake and utilisation of TR
 - Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and utilisation of TR experienced in specific subgroups of stroke survivors
 - Barriers and facilitators experienced with specific approaches to TR intervention

Intervention

Included:
 - Interventions whereby rehabilitation services are provided by a TR provider to a stroke survivor remotely via information and communication technologies. All formats of TR delivery will be considered, including but not limited to: (1) mode of communication between TR provider and stroke survivor: audio-only calling, videoconferencing, digital text or automated delivery of participant progress with intervention collected via sensors (2) rehabilitative intervention: video, image or written rehabilitation programmes, or rehabilitation programmes facilitated via apps, virtual-reality (VR), sensors or haptic technology (3) aim of intervention: to improve, maintain or promote self-management of physical, cognitive, speech and/or social/emotional functioning impairments in stroke survivors as a consequence of stroke. Greater than 50% of all communication between TR provider and stroke survivor must have taken place remotely through telecommunication technology, rather than face-to-face in order to be considered TR. TR approaches will be eligible for inclusion if they are provided with real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (synchronous), no real-time communication between TR provider and stroke survivor (asynchronous), or a combination of the two.
Excluded:
 - TR interventions that are assessment only or TR interventions that aim to prevent stroke.

This review considers studies that investigate health and non-health supply chain professionals' perceptions and perspectives on soft skills for effective service delivery in their working environment.

Not applicable 

A systematic review combining all the identified key soft tissue changes (shortening of latissimus dorsi, pectoralis minor, subscapularis and the posterior capsule as well as the ideal ratio of the internal and external rotators), (as emphasized in the introduction section of the proposal) and proposing a novel comprehensive biomechanical assessment model predictive for developing shoulder pain is yet to be compiled and published. The identified structures can then all be incorporated into a scientifically developed comprehensive biomechanical assessment protocol of the glenohumeral joint. Utilisation of this comprehensive biomechanical assessment tool can therefore lead to the early identification of modifiable risk factors for developing shoulder pain. Baseline values can be collected at the inception of treatment and progress can be monitored by regular monitoring of the modifiable risk factors proposed in the comprehensive biomechanical assessment model. Clinically a more informed rehabilitation program can be developed, leading to a potentially shorter and more effective rehabilitation process. It is therefore the aim of the proposed systematic review to explore the association of the above-mentioned soft tissue structures, and to identify any additional soft tissue changes associated with the development of shoulder pain, for inclusion into a comprehensive biomechanical assessment shoulder evaluation model.

Infant feeding method will be categorized in four ways: exclusive breastfeeding at the breast; expressed breastmilk of mothers' own milk by any method (e.g. bottle, supplemental nursing system, syringe, spoon, or cup); mixed feeding which is a combination breastmilk, formula or pasteurized human donor breast milk; and formula feeding via bottle.